The Black Box War
Reconstruct the Battle Nobody Remembers
An interstellar battle was fought, won, and erased. Every ship's black box contains a different version of events. The official record says the engagement never happened, but wreckage from forty-seven warships has been recovered from a debris field that should not exist. Investigators are assigned to reconstruct what happened by comparing contradictory memory cores, testimony from crews who remember different battles, and physical evidence that matches none of the accounts. Someone edited the records. The question is who, and what they are hiding.
“Black box 14 says Captain Torres ordered a retreat at 0847. Black box 22 says Captain Torres was already dead at 0830. Both boxes are authentic, unmodified, and certified by the same technician. I need a third explanation.”
- Lead Investigator Priya Chandrasekhar, preliminary report
—
1. Setting Overview & Tone
High-Concept Pitch: The Black Box War is an investigation story in a military sci-fi setting. The characters are not soldiers. They are analysts, forensic technicians, and legal investigators assigned to determine what happened during a battle that every official source denies took place. The wreckage says otherwise. The black boxes say forty-seven different things. The survivors cannot agree on who they were fighting, who gave the orders, or why.
Tone: Procedural, paranoid, and increasingly unsettling. The setting begins as a straightforward forensic puzzle and becomes something stranger as the contradictions resist resolution. The characters are professionals. They trust evidence. The evidence is telling them things that cannot all be true, and the pressure to stop asking comes from people with the authority to make the investigation disappear.
Sensory Pillars:
- Sight: A wall of screens displaying forty-seven different battle timelines, color-coded and overlapping. The interior of a recovered ship bridge, scorch marks on the ceiling, control panels frozen mid-display. A witness interview room where every veteran draws a different map of the same engagement.
- Sound: Black box audio: static, shouted orders, alarms, and stretches of silence that last longer than they should. The hum of a data center processing terabytes of contradictory sensor logs. The click of a recording device being turned off by someone who outranks the investigator.
- Touch & Smell: The cold metal of a recovered hull fragment that carries residue from a weapon system nobody in the fleet uses. The weight of a sealed evidence box labeled with a ship name that does not appear in any registry. The dry, recycled air of a military archive where the temperature is kept low to preserve the memory cores.
—
2. The Investigation Site
Chandrasekhar Station is the converted supply depot serving as investigation headquarters. It is deliberately isolated, located in a dead system with no civilian traffic. The station has been retrofitted with forensic labs, a secure data center, and interview suites. It is uncomfortable, underfunded, and exactly far enough from anyone important that the investigators suspect they were placed here to fail quietly.
The Debris Field is three light-hours from the station. Physical evidence from the battle drifts here: hull sections, escape pods (some occupied, some not), weapon fragments, and personal effects. Each recovery mission adds evidence and raises questions. The debris is consistent with a major fleet engagement. The fleet has no record of one.
The Archive is a sealed section of the station containing the original black boxes and all recovered data cores. Access requires two-person authorization. The archive’s inventory has been altered twice since the investigation began, both times attributed to filing errors. Investigator Chandrasekhar has stopped believing in filing errors.
The Witness Ward houses sixteen veterans recovered from escape pods and hospital ships. Their physical injuries are consistent with combat. Their memories are not consistent with each other. Neurological scans show no evidence of tampering, which either means their memories are genuine or the tampering is better than current detection methods.
—
3. Factions
The Investigation Team is small, underfunded, and increasingly aware that their assignment may be intended to produce a report nobody reads. Chandrasekhar is competent, stubborn, and beginning to suspect that the answer will make powerful people uncomfortable. Her team includes a forensic data analyst, a weapons specialist, a military historian, and a psychologist assigned to the witnesses.
Fleet Intelligence is officially cooperating and practically obstructing. Their liaison, Commander Ekström, provides information promptly when asked, but the information frequently contradicts previously provided information. Ekström is polite, helpful, and never available when the contradictions are discovered. The investigation team cannot determine whether Ekström is hiding something or whether Fleet Intelligence genuinely does not know what happened.
The Survivors are not a unified group. Some want answers. Some want to be discharged and left alone. Two of them remember fighting each other, which should be impossible because they served on the same ship. One survivor, Petty Officer Voss, has requested protective custody because she remembers something the others do not, and she believes the people who erased the battle know she remembers.
The Redaction Office is a division within military administration that handles classified information. Its involvement in the case has not been officially confirmed, but three evidence items have been reclassified since the investigation began, and the reclassification orders originate from an office that, according to the organizational chart, does not exist.
—
4. Unique Mechanic: Coherence
The investigation maintains a shared Coherence score starting at 0.
Advancing Coherence (+1 each):
- Verify a fact through two independent sources
- Resolve a contradiction between black box accounts
- Recover physical evidence that confirms a timeline
- Obtain testimony that fills a gap without creating new contradictions
Reducing Coherence (-1 each):
- Discover a new contradiction that cannot be resolved with existing evidence
- Lose access to evidence through reclassification, destruction, or theft
- A witness recants or changes testimony under pressure
- Receive disinformation that passes initial verification
Thresholds:
| Coherence | Unlocked |
|---|---|
| 3 | The team can identify which ships were present |
| 5 | The team can identify who gave the orders |
| 7 | The team can reconstruct the sequence of events |
| 9 | The team can identify who edited the records |
| 10 | The team knows the truth and can prove it |
At Coherence 7+, the Redaction Office begins active countermeasures. At 9+, someone with significant authority offers the team a choice: publish a sanitized version or continue and accept the professional consequences.
—
5. Character Archetypes
The Data Forensicist
You read black boxes the way a linguist reads dead languages. The data is your primary witness, and right now your primary witness is telling you forty-seven different stories. You have found formatting anomalies in twelve of the boxes that suggest editing, but the edits are so sophisticated they could also be normal wear.
- Drive: “Find the one box that was not touched. Every edit leaves an original somewhere.”
- Approach Distribution: Force 1 | Finesse 2 | Mind 4 | Presence 1
The Witness Handler
You interview the survivors. Your job is to separate genuine memory from confabulation, trauma response, and deliberate deception. You are good at your job. You are currently interviewing people whose memories are neurologically authentic and mutually exclusive, which your training did not prepare you for.
- Drive: “These people deserve to know what happened to them, even if the answer is something I do not have a category for.”
- Approach Distribution: Force 1 | Finesse 2 | Mind 2 | Presence 3
The Military Historian
You were assigned because the fleet expected a simple attribution report: who fired first, who was at fault, close the file. Instead, you are reconstructing a battle that used tactics from three different doctrines, two of which belong to nations that were not involved. You have started reading the wreckage like a text, and the text describes a battle fought by people who should not have been in the same system.
- Drive: “The wreckage tells a story. I will read it correctly, even if the author did not want it read.”
- Approach Distribution: Force 1 | Finesse 1 | Mind 3 | Presence 3
—
6. Starter Scenario & Why It Matters
Box 33: A newly recovered black box contains a complete, unedited record of the battle from start to finish. Its account is coherent, detailed, and does not match any other box. More importantly, it identifies all combatants, and the list includes a ship belonging to the investigators’ own fleet that was officially decommissioned two years before the battle. Commander Ekström immediately classifies the box. Petty Officer Voss requests an emergency interview, saying the ship named in Box 33 is the one she remembers serving on, the one that does not appear in any record. The Redaction Office sends a representative to the station for the first time. The team has perhaps 48 hours before Box 33 is transferred to a facility they will never access. They must decide what to copy, who to trust, and whether the truth they are assembling is worth the careers they will spend to prove it.
Why It Matters: The Black Box War asks what truth is worth when the institution responsible for preserving it is also responsible for erasing it. The setting is about the tension between loyalty to an organization and loyalty to the record. The investigators are not rebels. They are professionals who believe in the system they serve. The system is asking them to stop.